By Phillip Swann
The TV Answer Man –@tvanswerman
TV Answer Man, can you explain to me why YouTube can’t have a single team plan as part of the Sunday Ticket subscription when the NBA and MLB have single team plans? Is this just a blunder on their part? A lot of people, me included, would get the single team plan if it were a bit less expensive. Come on, YouTube. — Jamal, Riverdale, California.
Jamal, YouTube and YouTube TV this week announced the pricing for the 2023 NFL Sunday Ticket with the highest priced plan (games and RedZone for YouTube standalone subs) going for $489 after June 6. See this article for more details.
The prices surprised some fans who were expecting (or, at least, hoping) for a price break compared to what DIRECTV charged for the Ticket. (YouTube’s plans are more expensive unless you are a YouTube TV sub who orders the base plan before June 6. That plan is actually $44 less than DIRECTV, although the satcaster might counter that it provided the Ticket for free to new customers. Free trumps all.)
Google, which owns YouTube, also did not include a less expensive, single-team plan in the mix, another point of fan frustration according to social media posts. While DIRECTV did not offer a single-team package either, some people thought that Google and YouTube would be different. (DIRECTV in past years did permit single-week purchases but did not do so in 2021 or 2022.)
Click Amazon: See Today’s 1-Day-Only Discounts!
Fans noted that MLB.TV, the online plan for the league’s out-of-market games, has a feature where you can just order one team rather than the entire package. The NBA does this as well for NBA League Pass. The cost to watch the out-of-market games of one team usually is $20-30 less than the cost of the entire plan. (Note: Local blackout rules still apply for the single team option.)
So, you ask, wouldn’t it have been smart for YouTube to do the same with the NFL Sunday Ticket?
Answer: Not necessarily.
Google has agreed to pay $2.2 billion a year to the league for the exclusive rights to the Sunday Ticket. To make that investment worthwhile, the company needs a lot of revenue coming back in Ticket subscriptions.
If YouTube agreed to offer a single team package, more people who otherwise wouldn’t subscribe would undoubtedly sign up. But the problem is that many people who are now willing to pay anywhere from $249 to $489 for the entire package would undoubtedly downgrade to a sub-$200 single team option, which could mean less revenue overall for Google.
Unlike the MLB and NBA, the NFL has only one client for its package of out-of-market games. And it’s Google which has agreed to pay a small fortune for the honor. Consequently, a single team would be risky, possibly triggering an economic bath.
Click Amazon: See Today’s 1-Day-Only Discounts!
Jamal, hope that makes sense. Happy viewing and stay safe!
Need to buy something today? Please buy it using this Amazon.com link. This site receives a small portion of each purchase, which helps us continue to provide these articles.
Have a question about new TV technologies? Send it to The TV Answer Man at email@example.com Please include your first name and hometown in your message.
— Phillip Swann
All they did was convince me to not have Sunday ticket for the first time in 10 years. I’ve been a streaming customer for the last 4. I’ll keep my NFL plus plan and watch every game. Can’t watch them all live anyway and I get all 22 all for 90 bucks a year.
None of the games on YouTube will be live anyway since there will be a large streaming delay.
While you’re technically correct in saying there will be a delay, it’s likely only 5-7 seconds, as live sports don’t typically have 30-second broadcast delays. (Hence the live F-bombs from players and coaches.) They’re as “live” as any other broadcast, streamed or otherwise.
Such a stupid answer.
“But the problem is that many people who are now willing to pay anywhere from $249 to $489 for the entire package would undoubtedly downgrade to a sub-$200 single team option, which could mean less revenue overall for Google.”
I was willing to pay $300, but I am unwilling to pay $500 for the same package. So, while, yes, some people who were willing to pay $500 would’ve downgraded to a cheaper package, it is also true that people who were willing to pay $300 are unwilling to pay $500. Especially in 2023 with less money for households to spend on luxury items and entertainment. I’m certain that for every individual who would’ve downgraded from $500 to $300, there are >1 individuals who will now not subscribe at all. Resulting in an overall reduction in revenue.
In my own little anecdotal life circle, I had Sunday Ticket, my parents had it, my uncle had it, my brother had it, and a close friend’s parents had it. My uncle is still on the fence, but the other 4 out of the 5 of us will not be subscribing. So they went from $1500 in subscriptions to potentially $500.