MASN Streaming: Is There Anything New?


Q. I really, really want to watch the Washington Nationals this season on MASN without a cable or satellite subscription. Is MASN closer to letting the streaming services offer it? Is there anything new with this ridiculous situation? — Evan, Bowie, Maryland.

Evan, as you know, MASN, the regional sports channel that carries both the Nationals and the Baltimore Orioles, has largely only been available in the Baltimore/Washington market with a subscription to a pay TV service such as Comcast’s Xfinity, Cox, Verizon, Dish or DIRECTV.

The two exceptions:

* Layer3, which is delivered over a Internet-based set-top and costs $80 a month, not including the set-top rental fee.

* And Comcast’s Instant TV, a live streaming service from the cable operator which costs more than $50 a month (for the package that has MASN) and requires a Comcast Internet plan.

Click Amazon: Today’s Deals of the Day.

That’s not particularly helpful for anyone looking to cut the cord, and cut their monthly bills.

MASN’s owners, the Peter Angelos family, which also owns the Orioles, has steadfastly refused to sell the channel to live streaming services such as DIRECTV Now and Sling TV, which are less expensive and do not require equipment fees. MASN has also balked at suggestions that it sell the channel directly to consumers for a monthly fee, as HBO, Showtime and several other channels now do online.

Since MASN has refused to comment on the reasons behind this stubbornness, we can only offer an educated guess.

MASN has been in a dispute with the Nationals for several years now over how much the DC-based team should get in licensing fees. The Angelos family says the Orioles should get the lion’s share of the channel’s profits because it did not try to block the Montreal Expos from moving to Washington in 2004, and becoming the Nationals. Until then, the Orioles had the entire Washington-Baltimore market to themselves.

However, the Nats, and Major League Baseball, say the D.C. team deserves a larger slice of the pie. The league has even supported this stance in various rulings, but MASN has successfully blocked any change in the fee structure in the courts.

My belief is that MASN won’t approve a new streaming policy until this situation is resolved. The channel probably does not want to add a new revenue source (from the streaming services) that could further complicate the Nats-O’s battle.

So when will this matter be fixed?

There have been various reports during the off-season that a solution is imminent. Of course, we’ve heard that before. But if the two sides can reach a deal, I think that will open the door to streaming for MASN.

— Phillip Swann

6 comments on “MASN Streaming: Is There Anything New?”

  1. MASN needs to get permission to stream in market from mlb and pay to lease that right from them. Actually, MLB owns in market streaming. The teams and RSNs have no ownership, but most teams lease that right back from mlb for the right to in market stream. Interestingly, all mlb teams in market streaming has expired this year, and there is talk that MLB may sell it directly in market through or by selling it to a company like Disney or Amazon. Complicating matters (or possibly making things easier) is that all the fox sports nets are also up for auction and without owners.

  2. It’s such a joke. I have and Directv Now and can watch every team in the league EXCEPT the one that plays a mile from my house.

  3. I live in North Carolina and have a subscription with MLB.TV to watch all the Braves games, but they are blacked out when they play the Nationals, even though my cable provided down here doesn’t carry MASN. So I can’t see the games at all. That sucks.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.