SportsNet LA: Why Doesn’t Charter Lower Its Fees?

3 comments

Q. It’s 2020 and it looks like the Dodgers won’t be on DIRECTV yet again this season. Isn’t there anything that can be done about this?! Why won’t Charter just lower the fees so every TV company would carry SportsNet LA? It doesn’t make any sense to me at all. — Bev, Marina Del Rey, California. 

Bev, you’re right. SportsNet LA, the TV home of the Los Angeles Dodgers, is not available on any cable or satellite TV service in the LA market except for Charter Spectrum, which has the management rights to the channel.

Click Amazon: See Today’s Best-Selling Streaming Devices!!

The pay TV services say Charter is demanding excessive fees to carry the channel, an allegation denied by the cable operator.  But there seems to be no end to the dispute which has now gone on for five years.

Click Amazon: See Today’s Top-Selling Smart TVs!!

So, you ask, if the pay TV ops won’t carry it, why doesn’t Charter just lower its carriage fee so they will? Certainly there has to be a price that would make it worthwhile to DIRECTV, Cox, Dish, U-verse and the live streaming services such as Sling TV, YouTube TV and Hulu Live.

Right?

Well, the obvious answer is yes, but lowering the price is a big loser for Charter. The cable operator is paying the Dodgers roughly $334 million a year to manage the channel. Yes, $334 million. So if it lowers the fees, it would take a huge bath. The revenue would never come close to the annual payments it must make to the Dodgers.

Oh, you say, isn’t it taking a bath anyway because no one is carrying the channel?

Yes, but Charter does get some financial benefit by not selling the channel to rival pay TV services. Because Charter is the only major TV provider offering SportsNet LA, many LA residents have subscribed to the cable service largely, if not solely, for that reason. So SportsNet LA has generated added revenue for Charter via extra subscriptions.

We don’t know how many have signed up for Charter to get SportsNet LA — it’s certainly not enough to offset an annual expense of $334 million — but the cable operator has clearly calculated that it’s enough people that it would rather bank on that than lower its carriage fees for the likes of DIRECTV.

It’s all about money, Bev, and how Charter decides to manage a bad situation. (Charter inherited the Dodgers contract as part of its purchase of Time Warner Cable, which actually negotiated the deal.) That may seem not fair, but in baseball and business, fair is not always in play.

— Phillip Swann

Photo credit: Free photo from Pexels.com.

3 comments on “SportsNet LA: Why Doesn’t Charter Lower Its Fees?”

  1. Charter would rather have 1 customer paying $100,000,000 per year than 1,000,000 customers paying $100 per year. – Fewer bills to sent out – Postage is getting expensive and customer service centers in India can be shut down and handled by 1 part timer in LA.

  2. Charter does NOT cover ALL of the Los Angeles area.
    So they are missing Out on a Lot of Customers.
    How about Spectrum RE-Negotiating with the Dodgers,
    Then everyone could get the Game like before.
    Some Fool set this up 5 years ago and it Back Fired big time.
    They Never would have got $ 334 Million in the first place.

  3. At least add the channel to your streaming list, you would get a lot more hits that way if people who have another tv provider but your internet didn’t have to worry about any more tv installations and could just stream the channel.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.